logigoglx.blogg.se

Tune sweeper sucks
Tune sweeper sucks







With 7000 tracks, however, that’s lost in the noise. What I particularly appreciate about this view is that it makes all the preference settings that it uses to decide which to keep very obvious, as it also does with the criteria being applied to identify duplicate tracks.ĭon’t care about dupes? If you’re perpetually on shuffle play, it really can be invisible, with the only difference being that they’re 2x as likely to play as a track that isn’t duplicated. I’m a bit paranoid about duplicate tracks because my library is so darn large I don’t always remember what’s been ripped or purchased before I go to add tracks again.Īnd indeed, the new Julian Lennon CD Everything Changes appears to have been imported twice:Ī click on “Continue” and all the details are revealed: Launch the app and it’s pretty self-explanatory:

#Tune sweeper sucks license

For the modest license price of $24.99 - and a free version that you can start with to see if your library has any issues before you purchase - it’ll clean things up way faster than you could ever do so manually.

tune sweeper sucks

Fixing it for a few thousand CDs? Fuggetaboutit! Fixing that for a half-dozen CDs? No problem.

tune sweeper sucks

The problem is, once things get messed up, it’s a lot of work to fix it, whether it’s mistitled tracks (I hate typos in track names personally), missing album cover art, or even entries for tracks or CDs that somehow aren’t on the drive any more, or have moved for some mysterious reason. If you have the disk space, it’s easy, and on our office file server, our master music collection is in the multiple gigabytes, thousands upon thousands of tracks spanning a wide variety of musical genres. Rip a few music CDs, download a few from the iTunes Store and maybe even get a dozen from friends via email or a flash drive and without realizing it, you have dozens or hundreds of CDs stored on your Windows PC.







Tune sweeper sucks